Top 3 High Dividend ETFs

Young woman viewing high dividend ETF financial growth charts and profits

Table of Contents

⚠️ This article is not investment advice. Investing can lead to financial loss. The information shared is based on my personal experience and research. However, further research is recommended to confirm the information in this article.

High dividend ETFs appeal to many investors who want to obtain regular passive income while remaining exposed to the stock markets.

However, not all dividend ETFs follow the same strategy. Some primarily select companies that already pay high dividends. Others favor companies capable of increasing their dividends over time.

In this article, I compare three ETFs that I find particularly interesting for those with a high dividend strategy:

  • VYM* : a US ETF focused on US companies that pay high dividends
  • VHYL* : a global ETF composed of high-dividend global companies
  • DGRO* : an American ETF that selects companies with a history of dividend growth.

My goal is not to designate one ETF as the best in every situation. Rather, I want to compare their historical performance, diversification, dividends, fees, and characteristics to better understand their differences.

A high dividend ETF is a publicly traded fund that groups together many shares of companies that generally pay large dividends.

Instead of individually buying dozens or hundreds of shares, the investor can obtain diversified exposure through a single ETF.

However, there are different strategies:

  • an ETF high dividend yield primarily selects companies that currently pay high dividends.
  • an ETF of dividend growth favours companies whose dividends tend to increase regularly.

In reality:

  • VYM and VHYL are high-dividend ETFs
  • DGRO is primarily pursuing a dividend growth strategy.

In this blog, I've often written that I prefer growth ETFs to dividend ETFs. However, high-dividend ETFs also have their advantages. For example:

The three ETFs studied hold several hundred, or even several thousand, companies.

VHYL stands out for its international exposure, while VYM and DGRO are primarily invested in the United States.

If you own, for example, an S&P 500 ETF or a Nasdaq 100 ETF, buying a high-dividend ETF (like the DGRO) brings complementary sector diversification and a regular passive income stream every 3 months, while reducing overall portfolio volatility.

Indeed, a high dividend ETF offers exposure to certain mature sectors and invests in companies that provide regular passive income to the investor through the high dividend.

The three ETFs generally pay high dividends every quarter (every 3 months).

The investor can use these distributions as supplementary income or reinvest them to gradually increase the number of shares held.

Once the investment is made, the ETF generally requires little monitoring.

The investor must still monitor their allocation, manage dividends, and file their tax return. ETFs are therefore very passive investments, but they are not entirely management-free.

There are many high-dividend ETFs, here are my 3 favorites.

VYM invests primarily in large American companies that pay high dividends.

Its main advantages are:

  • an exposure to several hundred American companies
  • historically very low management fees
  • a dividend yield generally higher than that of an ETF tracking the entire US market.

Its main limitation is its geographical exposure: it is concentrated on the United States.

VHYL invests in high-dividend companies spread across several regions of the world.

Its main advantages are:

  • strong geographical diversification
  • a significant number of owned companies
  • a historically higher dividend yield than that of VYM and DGRO.

In return, its fees are higher and its historical performance has been lower than that of the two ETFs studied.

DGRO invests primarily in US companies with a history of dividend growth.

Unlike VYM and VHYL, its objective is not solely to seek the highest dividends. It also favors companies capable of increasing their dividend payouts over time.

Its main advantages are:

  • an exposure to several hundred American companies
  • historically attractive capital growth potential

However, its dividend yield is generally lower than that of VHYL and VYM.

VYMDGROVHYL
Number of shares
(Approximate)
6003902,400
US stock market or global stock marketUSUSGlobal
ETF objectiveInvesting in American companies that pay high dividendsInvesting in American companies that regularly increase their dividendsInvesting in global companies that pay high dividends

To compare performance, I used the annualized ten-year returns published by the fund managers, over a period from approximately May 2015 to May 2025.

AND FHistorical annualized return over 10 years
DGROApproximately 11.5 %
VYMApproximately 9.7 %
VHYLApproximately 6.7 %

These results represent past performance. They do not allow us to predict future returns.

As an example, a hypothetical investment of USD 10,000, with reinvestment of distributions, would have yielded approximately:

AND FHypothetical value after 10 years
DGROUSD 29,700
VYMUSD 25,900
VHYLUSD 19,100

During this period, DGRO achieved its best performance ever.

However, this conclusion depends on the period studied. A different period might produce a different ranking.

Diversification can be assessed according to several criteria: the number of companies, geographical distribution and exposure to different sectors.

AND FMain ExhibitionApproximate number of shares
DGROUNITED STATESApproximately 400
VYMUNITED STATESApproximately 585
VHYLWhole worldMore than 2,400

VHYL owns the largest number of companies and offers the greatest geographical diversification.

It is difficult to designate one ETF as "the safest".

VYM and VHYL are managed by Vanguard, while DGRO is managed by iShares. Both companies are major and well-established players in asset management.

However, the risk depends primarily on the shares held and market developments.

Therefore, a high-dividend ETF is not a risk-free investment.

All three ETFs are passive and very easy for the investor to manage.

The fund manager automatically applies the fund's strategy and adjusts its composition as needed. Therefore, the investor does not need to select the companies themselves.

In theory, All three ETFs are easy to buy or sell from a brokerage account.. There is no ETF that is easier or harder to invest in.

All three ETFs generally require very little time.

A simple strategy could be to invest regularly, check your allocation once or twice a year and reinvest dividends if necessary.

All three ETFs are invested in equities and can experience significant fluctuations.

Their volatility is not identical because their compositions and geographical exposures differ. VHYL is global, while VYM and DGRO are primarily American.

During some difficult periods, all three ETFs experienced significant declines. It would therefore be misleading to consider a high-dividend ETF as a low-volatility investment.

Based on the data used in this comparison, the annual dividend yields were approximately:

AND FApproximate dividend yield
VHYLApproximately 3.8 %
VYMApproximately 2.8 %
DGROApproximately 2.4 %

Based on this criterion, VHYL has historically offered the highest dividend yield.

However, a high dividend yield does not guarantee a better total return. A company can pay more dividends while experiencing lower growth.

The three ETFs generally pay quarterly distributions, or about four times a year.

By roughly separating dividends from total performance, the historical results used in this article yield the following ranking:

AND FApproximate annual return excluding dividends
DGROApproximately 9.1 %
VYMApproximately 6.9 %
VHYLApproximately 2.8 %

Over the period studied, DGRO achieved the best capital growth excluding dividends.

This difference can be explained in particular by its strategy focused on dividend growth and by its strong exposure to the American market.

The taxation of ETFs is more complex than a simple comparison of dividend yield.

In Switzerland, dividends are often taxed more heavily than capital gains. Therefore, The best ETF from a tax perspective is the one that has the best growth and distributes the fewest dividends.

During the period analyzed, the DGRO ETF achieved the best growth and distributed the fewest dividends..

Thus, it is the most tax-efficient option. However, it would be too simplistic to claim that DGRO is automatically the best tax choice simply because it pays out fewer dividends.

The fees are not limited to the TER (ETF management fee). The following must also be taken into account:

  • broker's transaction fees
  • any potential exchange fees
  • childcare fees

However, the TER trains used in this comparison are approximately:

AND FApproximate TER
VYM0,06 %
DGRO0,08 %
VHYL0,29 %

Based solely on the TER (regional express train) criterion, VYM is the least expensive., but closely followed by DGRO.

It is possible to make an estimate of the net return taking into account costs and taxes.

However, this estimate remains theoretical. Actual taxation depends in particular on the country and canton of residence, income, broker, and the investor's personal circumstances.

Using the simplified assumptions employed in this article, the historical ranking is:

  1. DGRO
  2. VYM
  3. VHYL

DGRO maintains its lead thanks to its best historical performance over the period studied.

However, this does not mean that it will offer the best net return over the next ten years.

The ETFs presented in this article are obviously not the only ones available. There are several other high-quality ETFs that may also be suitable depending on each investor's objectives.

Among the best known, we can notably mention:

AND FSpecial feature
HDVSelects American companies renowned for the strength of their dividends and their financial health.
SCHDVery popular in the United States, it favors quality companies with sustainable and growing dividends. Its performance history is excellent, but it is not easily accessible to all European investors.
SDYInvests in US companies that have increased their dividends for many consecutive years ("Dividend Aristocrats").
FUSDAn Irish-domiciled UCITS ETF that selects developed companies offering quality dividends. An attractive alternative for European investors.
SPYDInvests in S&P 500 stocks offering the highest dividend yields. Prioritizes immediate income over dividend growth.

I chose to compare VYM, DGRO and VHYL, because I consider them to be three complementary approaches:

  • VYM represents a strategy focused on high dividends in the United States
  • DGRO prioritizes long-term dividend and capital growth
  • VHYL provides global diversification with a generally higher dividend yield.

In my opinion, these three ETFs cover most of the needs of investors looking to build a dividend-oriented portfolio. However, it's worth noting that other options are available.

CriteriaETF that stands out
Best historical performance over 10 yearsDGRO
Greater geographical diversificationVHYL
Larger number of companiesVHYL
safest ETFNo obvious winner
Most passive investment, simplicity of investment and management timeEquality
Distribution of the highest dividendVHYL
Frequency of distributionsEquality
Best historical performance excluding dividendsDGRO
Lowest management feesVYM
Historically the least taxed ETF in SwitzerlandDGRO,
Best overall net historical performanceDGRO

In my opinion, the choice depends primarily on the desired objective.

AND FFor which investors?
DGROInvestors seek a balance between capital growth and increasing dividends. DGRO focuses on US companies that consistently raise their dividends, rather than those that only offer the highest dividends.
VYMInvestors seeking a relatively high dividend yield while maintaining exposure to large US companies may find VYM suitable for those wishing to combine regular income, long-term growth potential, and very low management fees.
VHYLInvestors who want global diversification and wish to obtain 3-4% in annual dividends.

Personally, I believe that DGRO has historically offered the best balance between capital growth and dividend growth.. Moreover, it is historically the least taxable ETF in Switzerland.

However, I do not consider it automatically superior depending on the situation and stock market objectives.

The best ETF will always depend on the strategy, investment horizon, risk tolerance, taxation and the composition of the portfolio already held.

Conclusion: VYM, VHYL or DGRO?

Regarding the historical period studied, DGRO achieved the best overall performance. Its strategy, focused on dividend growth, appears to have favored both capital growth and increased distributions.

VYM also achieved good results, with a performance slightly lower than that of DGRO, but with lower management fees.

VHYL It is distinguished primarily by its global diversification, its large number of companies, and its historically higher dividend yield compared to DGRO or VYM. However, its past performance has been weaker and its management fees higher.

If I analyze the period analyzed, my ranking among the 3 ETFs is:

  1. DGRO = best past performance and the least taxed, but also the one that distributed the fewest dividends
  2. VYM = A very good compromise between high dividends, ETF growth and low fees
  3. VHYL = for global diversification and the one that has distributed the most dividends, but also historically, the one that has obtained the lowest overall return and the one that has been taxed the most.

As I often say,”In the stock market, you can't win everywhere.”.

FAQ: The Top 3 High Dividend ETFs

There is no single best dividend ETF for all investors. Based on the historical performance examined in this article, DGRO achieved the best overall performance. However, VYM constitutes an excellent compromise between high dividends, low fees and growth, while VHYL is particularly attractive for investors seeking global diversification and higher dividend yields.

Of the three ETFs compared, VHYL is the one that has historically distributed the highest dividend yield, with approximately 3.8 % per year. VYM is located around 2,8 % and DGRO around 2,4 %. However, a higher dividend does not necessarily mean a better total return in the long term.

Over the period studied (2015 to 2025), DGRO It has posted its best historical performance thanks to strong growth in both its capital and dividends. However, past performance is not indicative of future results. Choosing an ETF should also take into account diversification, fees, taxation, and your investment strategy.

For a Swiss investor, several criteria are important: taxation, fees, diversification, and return. Historically, DGRO It has proven particularly attractive due to its growth and lower dividend yield, which can limit dividend taxation. However, the best choice always depends on your personal circumstances.

Not necessarily. In the long term, an ETF tracking the S&P 500 has often delivered higher returns than many dividend ETFs. Conversely, a dividend ETF typically provides a regular income stream through quarterly distributions. The two approaches can therefore be complementary within a diversified portfolio.

The three ETFs follow different strategies. VYM invests in American companies that already pay high dividends. DGRO favors American companies that regularly increase their dividends. VHYL, Meanwhile, it invests in high-dividend companies spread across the world.

Yes. Even though the selected companies are often more mature, a dividend ETF remains an equity investment. Its value can therefore fluctuate significantly depending on the performance of the financial markets. Dividends are never guaranteed and can be reduced or eliminated if the companies encounter difficulties.

The three ETFs compared in this article (VYM, DGRO And VHYL) generally distribute dividends four times a year, This represents a distribution every three months. The amount of dividends may vary from quarter to quarter depending on the profits made by the companies held in the ETF.

Subscribe for the latest news

You have a frugalist or minimalist project and you want a training? Click ”here”.
My pages
Lastest Post

How does this blog live?

Overall, this blog lives on sharing a frugal and minimalist lifestyle.

For a question of transparency towards the readers. All recommended products are in order to make life cheaper, simpler and to promote the essentials.

  • Trainings that I realize
  • Promo codes for the products I use
  • Donations that readers make in exchange for neutral information.
About me

Compared to before, I was a person who consumed a lot until the day I realized that my consumption made me sadder and poorer 😑

Now I prefer the minimum of my needs to be happy and achieve my financial freedom.

Without realizingI started to focus on saving and investing to depend on a boss for as little time as possible and to speed up my personal projects.

As a result, I am getting richer in a way that I never imagined since I have an average salary in Switzerland.

It is for this purpose that I decided to create this blog. In order to share and learn with other people who seek freedom and simplicity 😉

Are you rather minimalist or frugal Jonny?

I am as minimalist as I am frugalist. However, there are situations where I lean more towards an art of life.

To conclude, I think the most important thing is to feel comfortable in your lifestyle 😊

Sign up for the latest tips and tricks.
I promise! You won’t be bombarded with e-mails.
Minimalist and Frugalist Logo
Sign up for the latest tips and tricks.
I promise! You won’t be bombarded with e-mails.
Minimalist and Frugalist Logo

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

En savoir plus sur Minimaliste et Frugaliste

Abonnez-vous pour poursuivre la lecture et avoir accès à l’ensemble des archives.

Continue reading